Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cutting v. Gilbert.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cutting v. Gilbert Anchor | green | “there is scarcely a suit at law, or in equity, . . . in which a general statute is interpreted, that does not in- volve a question in which other parties are interested.” | 4 |
| 2 | Cutting v. Gilbert | green | “would confound the estab- lished order of judicial proceedings.” | 4 |
| 3 | West v. Randall | green | “quasi parties to the record, at least for the purpose of taking the benefit of the decree, and of entitling themselves to other equitable relief, if their rights were jeopardized.” | 4 |
| 4 | Emmons v. National Mut. Bldg. & Loan Ass'n | green | “beneficial to those whom he under- takes to represent” | 4 |
| 5 | Arthur v. Oakes | green | “preventive process of injunction,” | 4 |
| 6 | Arthur v. Oakes | green | “the only remedy which the law allows to prevent the commis- sion” | 4 |
| 7 | Mock v. Garland | green | “injunc- tions should be crafted to 'provide complete relief to the plaintiffs” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.