Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc. Anchor | green | “ultimately, the court must satisfy itself that it has jurisdiction to hear the suit.” | 9 |
| 2 | Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc. | green | “may receive and weigh affidavits and any other relevant matter to assist it in determining the jurisdictional facts.” | 8 |
| 3 | Triple Up Limited v. Youku Tudou Inc. | green | “on such a motion, the plaintiff bears the burden of 'establishing a factual basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction' over each defendant.” | 8 |
| 4 | Lewis v. Full Sail, LLC | green | “may exercise one of two types of personal jurisdiction: (1) 'general or all- purpose jurisdiction' or (2) 'specific or case-linked jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.