Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brittany Erin Hoak v. State of Indiana.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brittany Erin Hoak v. State of Indiana Anchor | green | “even when a trial court imposes a sentence within its discretion, the indiana constitution authorizes independent appellate review and revision of this sentencing decision.” | 16 |
| 2 | Larry C. Perry, Jr. v. State of Indiana | green | “the details and circumstances of the commission of the offense and the defendant's participation.” | 9 |
| 3 | Larry C. Perry, Jr. v. State of Indiana | green | “the nature of the offense is found in the details and circumstances of the commission of the offense and the defendant's participation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.