Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from La Barbera v. Town of Woodstock.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | La Barbera v. Town of Woodstock Anchor | green | “no longer can rely only on the unsupported factual allegations of the pleading, but must submit evidence demonstrating the existence of a cause of action” | 5 |
| 2 | Dreger v. New York State Thruway Authority | green | “the question of gross negligence is a matter to be determined by the trier of fact.” | 4 |
| 3 | Lichtenstein v. State | green | “executor or administrator be formally appointed before commencing an action against the state” | 4 |
| 4 | Lichtenstein v. State | green | “who starts her action in the court of claims before receiving letters of administration, does not meet the requirements of the court of claims act, and thus has not properly commenced the action” | 4 |
| 5 | Tooks v. State | green | “to comply with either the filing or service provisions of the court of claims act results in a lack of subject matter jurisdiction requiring dismissal of the claim” | 4 |
| 6 | Brown v. University of Rochester | green | “the court is tasked with determining whether the alleged facts in the claim fit within 'any cognizable legal theory” | 4 |
| 7 | Tooks v. State | green | “failure to comply with either the filing or service provisions of the court of claims act results in a lack of subject matter jurisdiction requiring dismissal of the claim” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.