Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue Anchor | green | “excluded religious schools ... based solely on religious status.” | 4 |
| 2 | St. Augustine School v. Carolyn Stanford Taylor | neutral | “a mutual organizational relationship.” | 4 |
| 3 | St. Augustine School v. Carolyn Stanford Taylor | neutral | “corporate documents, by-laws, and other types of organizational documents” | 4 |
| 4 | St. Augustine School v. Carolyn Stanford Taylor | neutral | “may also consider the professions of the school with re- gard to the school's self-identification and affiliation, but the superintendent may not conduct any investigation or surveil- lance with respect to the school's religious beliefs, practices, or teachings.” | 4 |
| 5 | St. Augustine School v. Jill Underly | green | “all that nos. 22-2786 22-2846 25 remains is for us to apply the instructions of the state supreme court to the facts of this case.” | 4 |
| 6 | St. Augustine School v. Jill Underly | green | “it was enough to decide whether the superinten- dent properly applied wisconsin law ... .” | 4 |
| 7 | Ottman v. Town of Primrose | green | “certiorari is a mech- anism by which a court may test the validity of a decision ren- dered by a municipality, an administrative agency, or an nos. 22-2786 22-2846 7 inferior tribunal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.