Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kapon v. Koch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kapon v. Koch Anchor | green | “must 'be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues and reducing delay and prolixity” | 12 |
| 2 | Kapon v. Koch | green | “must be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues and reducing delay and prolixity” | 5 |
| 3 | Geffner v. Mercy Medical Center | green | “not entitled to unlimited, uncontrolled, unfettered disclosure” | 5 |
| 4 | Geffner v. Mercy Medical Center | green | “a party is not entitled to unlimited, uncontrolled, unfettered disclosure” | 3 |
| 5 | Geffner v. Mercy Medical Center | green | “a party is not entitled to unlimited, uncontrolled, unfettered disclosure, and the supervision of discovery is generally left to the trial court's broad discretion” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.