Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 28 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Delon Echols.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Delon Echols Anchor | green | “a party ... can- not preserve one specific objection by making a different spe- cific objection in the trial court.” | 4 |
| 2 | Ciminelli v. United States | green | “money or property was 'an object of the defendants' fraud.” | 4 |
| 3 | Ciminelli v. United States | green | “potentially valuable economic information necessary to make discretionary economic deci- sions.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Jerry Peoples | green | “in undertaking this inquiry, we 'consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the government,' and will reverse 'only when the record contains no evidence, re- gardless of how it is weighed, from which the jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 4 |
| 5 | United States v. Kendrick Frazier | green | “nearly insurmountable hur- dle.” | 4 |
| 6 | Kousisis v. United States | green | “any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises ....” | 4 |
| 7 | Kousisis v. United States | green | “statutes do not require the government to prove ... any loss” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.