Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security Anchor | green | “years after the entry of a judgment on the merits” | 13 |
| 2 | De Mañez v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC | green | “no matter who allegedly commits a fraud on the court-a party, an attorney, or a nonparty witness-the court has the inherent power to conduct proceedings to investigate that allegation and, if it is proven, to punish that conduct.” | 6 |
| 3 | Bray v. United States | green | “a separate and independent proceeding at law” | 4 |
| 4 | Corder v. Howard Johnson & Company | green | “no matter who allegedly commits a fraud on the court-a party, an attorney, or a nonparty witness-the court has the inherent power to conduct proceedings to investigate that allegation and, if it is proven, to punish that conduct.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.