Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lawrence v. Texas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lawrence v. Texas Anchor | green | “the fact that the governing majority in a state has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice.” | 13 |
| 2 | Lawrence v. Texas | green | “the texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual.” | 12 |
| 3 | Lofton v. Secretary of the Department of Children & Family Services | green | “it is a strained and ultimately incorrect reading of lawrence to interpret it to announce a new fundamental right” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.