Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louise Han PEREZ; Joseph Eclavea Perez; John Velasco Cruz, Defendants-Appellants.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louise Han PEREZ; Joseph Eclavea Perez; John Velasco Cruz, Defendants-Appellants Anchor | green | “if the defendant has both invited the error, and relinquished a known right, then the error is waived and therefore unreviewable.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio | green | “error that is so clear-cut, so obvious, a competent district judge should be able to avoid it without benefit of objection.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Lindsey | green | “in order for the invited error doctrine to apply, a party must both invite the error and relinquish a known right” | 3 |
| 4 | Luther Tyars v. Dr. Richard Finner, Medical Director of Patton State Hospital, Patton, California | green | “was exhibited to the jury in physical restraints when the express question it was to decide was whether he was dangerous to himself or others.” | 3 |
| 5 | Pamella E. Settlegoode v. Portland Public Schools, Multnomah School District No.1 Susan Winthrop Robert Crebo Larry Whitson | green | “there is an even 'higher threshold' for granting a new trial where, as here, the moving party failed to object to the alleged misconduct during trial.” | 3 |
| 6 | Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Crystal Cox | green | “punish a pro se litigant with plain error rather than de novo review simply because he failed to say the words 'i object,” | 3 |
| 7 | John Draper v. D. Rosario | green | “review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.