Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Bay Rock Operating Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Bay Rock Operating Co. Anchor | green | “each motion independently, viewing the evidence and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 10 |
| 2 | Elmer T. Wilson, Sr. And Maxine Wilson v. United States Department of Agriculture | green | “only when it is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.” | 7 |
| 3 | National Hand Tool Corp. v. K.L. Pasquarell, Director Regional Service Center, United States Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “a denial by the uscis of an application for a visa may be reversed only if the decision was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law.” | 5 |
| 4 | Elmer T. Wilson, Sr. And Maxine Wilson v. United States Department of Agriculture | green | “a decision is arbitrary or capricious only when it is so implausible that it could not be ascribed to a difference in view or the product of agency expertise.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.