Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Far West Capital, Inc. And Steamboat Development Corp. v. Dorothy A. Towne and Fleetwood Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Far West Capital, Inc. And Steamboat Development Corp. v. Dorothy A. Towne and Fleetwood Corporation Anchor | green | “it is well-established that phone calls and letters are not necessarily sufficient in themselves to establish minimum contacts.” | 13 |
| 2 | Soma Medical International v. Standard Chartered Bank | green | “to obtain personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a diversity action, a plaintiff must show that jurisdiction is legitimate under the laws of the forum state and that the exercise of jurisdiction does not offend the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.” | 11 |
| 3 | Soma Medical International v. Standard Chartered Bank | green | “specific jurisdiction is present where the defendant has purposefully directed its activities at the residents of the forum and the litigation results from injuries that arise out of or relate to those activities.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.