Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roth v. NORFALCO LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Roth v. NORFALCO LLC Anchor | green | “material facts are those that could affect the outcome of the proceeding.” | 10 |
| 2 | Peters Township School District v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company | green | “courts are required to view the facts and draw reasonable inferences” | 9 |
| 3 | Doe v. C.A.R.S Protection Plus, Inc. | green | “is not onerous' and poses 'a burden easily met.” | 4 |
| 4 | Zachary Greenberg v. Jerry M. Lehocky | green | “at summary judgment, a plaintiff 'can no longer rest on . . . mere allegations, but must set forth by affidavit or other evidence specific facts' establishing standing.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.