Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections Anchor | green | “in the absence of any justifiable excuse, a pennsylvania inmate's failure to properly identify a defendant constitutes a failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies under the plra.” | 12 |
| 2 | Williams v. Beard | green | “the primary purpose of a grievance is to alert prison officials to a problem, not to provide personal notice to a particular official that he may be sued.” | 11 |
| 3 | Williams v. Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections | green | “a pennsylvania inmate's failure to properly identify a defendant constitutes a failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies under the plra.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.