Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-Appellants.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-Appellants Anchor | green | “a person bringing an action under the equal protection clause must show intentional discrimination against him because of his membership in a particular class, not merely that he was treated unfairly as an individual.” | 16 |
| 2 | David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-Appellants | green | “intentional discrimination against him because of his membership in a particular class, not merely that he was treated unfairly as an individual.” | 5 |
| 3 | Price v. Cohen | green | “to establish a violation of the equal protection clause, a plaintiff must show that the allegedly offensive categorization invidiously discriminates against the disfavored group.” | 3 |
| 4 | Hill v. Croft, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2005) | neutral | “a person bringing an action under the equal protection clause must show intentional discrimination against him because of his membership in a particular class, not merely that he was treated unfairly as an individual.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.