Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from William Joseph Healy, Jr. v. New York Life Insurance Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | William Joseph Healy, Jr. v. New York Life Insurance Company Anchor | green | “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 12 |
| 2 | MEYER, Joseph W., Appellant v. RIEGEL PRODUCTS CORPORATION and James River Corporation of Virginia | green | “all inferences, doubts, and issues of credibility ... against the moving party.” | 9 |
| 3 | Ralph R. Riehl, Jr. v. Travelers Insurance Co. | green | “ijssues of knowledge and intent are particularly inappropriate for resolution by summary judgment, since such issues must often be resolved on the basis of inferences drawn from the conduct of the parties.” | 3 |
| 4 | Coolspring Stone Supply, Inc. v. American States Life Insurance Company | green | “ijssues of knowledge and intent are particularly inappropriate for resolution by summary judgment, since such issues must often be resolved on the basis of inferences drawn from the conduct of the parties.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.