Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Genesco, Inc. v. Kakiuchi.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Genesco, Inc. v. Kakiuchi Anchor | green | “the decision to stay the balance of the proceedings pending arbitration is a matter largely within the district court's discretion to control its docket.” | 19 |
| 2 | Katsoris v. WME IMG, LLC | green | “a discretionary stay is particularly appropriate where there is significant factual overlap between the remaining claims and the arbitrated claims.” | 4 |
| 3 | Katsoris v. WME IMG, LLC | green | “the court must consider factors such as the desirability of avoiding piecemeal litigation and the degree to which the cases necessitate duplication of discovery or issue resolution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.