Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Frances Slade.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Frances Slade Anchor | green | “a party is not at liberty to articulate specific arguments for the first time on appeal simply because the general issue was before the district court.” | 12 |
| 2 | United States v. Dianne Sutherland, United States of America v. Alan W. Fini | green | “evidence obtained in violation of neither the constitution nor federal law is admissible in federal court proceedings without regard to state law.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Arthur W. Rumney | green | “issue is whether, even had the omitted statements been included in the affidavit, there was still probable cause to issue the warrant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.