Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Jones (Slip Opinion).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Jones (Slip Opinion) Anchor | green | “actual prejudice exists when missing evidence or unavailable testimony, identified by the defendant and relevant to the defense, would minimize or eliminate the impact of the state's evidence and bolster the defense.” | 14 |
| 2 | State v. Copeland, 89455 (1-24-2008) | green | “primary guarantee against bringing overly stale criminal charges.” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Michael Montgomery | green | “because proof of prejudice is always speculative.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Michael Montgomery | green | “the burden upon a defendant seeking to prove that pre-indictment delay violated due process is 'nearly insurmountable,' especially because proof of prejudice is always speculative.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.