Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Masoud Hosseini v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Masoud Hosseini v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General Anchor | green | “review is limited to the bia's decision, except to the extent that the ij's opinion is expressly adopted.” | 13 |
| 2 | Jian Guo v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “the key question is whether, looking at the cumulative effect of all the incidents a petitioner has suffered, the treatment he or she received rises to the level of persecution.” | 6 |
| 3 | J-S | green | “an alien is not per se entitled to refugee status solely upon the fact that his spouse was forced to undergo an abortion or sterilization.” | 3 |
| 4 | J-S | green | “does not explicitly exclude spouses from its purview,” | 3 |
| 5 | Zi Zhi Tang v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “for couples who do not meet the age requirements to marry under population control policies, the failure to have an official marriage ceremony does not preclude male partners of women who have had forced abortions from obtaining asylum under 1101(a)(42)(b)” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.