Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hardiman v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hardiman v. State Anchor | green | “must be unrehearsed and made while still under the stress of excitement from the startling event.” | 8 |
| 2 | Hardiman v. State | green | “the underlying rationale of the excited utterance exception is that such a declaration from one who has recently suffered an overpowering experience is likely to be truthful.” | 7 |
| 3 | Brooks v. State | green | “the threshold question imposed by crawford is whether the proffered out-of-court statement is 'testimonial' in nature.” | 3 |
| 4 | Shelby v. State | green | “the sixth amendment's right of confrontation is a fundamental right and is applicable to the states by virtue of the fourteenth amendment.” | 3 |
| 5 | Lopez v. State | green | “some excited utterances are testimonial, and others are not, depending on the circumstances.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Moscat | green | “because complainants in domestic violence cases often do not appear for trial, prosecutors have in recent years tried to fashion 'victim less' prosecutions” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.