Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Elliott Duke.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Elliott Duke Anchor | green | “narrowly tailored either by scope or by duration.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Elliott Duke | green | “the ubiquity and importance of the internet to the modern world.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Diego Duque-Hernandez | green | “affects the appellant's substantial rights, which means that the appellant must show that the error affected the outcome of the district court proceedings” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Chanda Huor | green | “affects the appellant's substantial rights, which means that the appellant must show that the error affected the outcome of the district court proceedings” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Maria Alvarez | green | “may still affirm a special condition if we can infer the district court's reasoning after an examination of the record.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Maria Alvarez | green | “the ability of a defendant to modify a special condition is only one factor considered as we determine whether to exercise our discretion.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. Howard Halverson | green | “does not object to the condition of his supervised release at sentencing, the court reviews for plain error.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.