Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Force v. Department of Revenue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Force v. Department of Revenue Anchor | green | “context' includes, among other things, other parts of the statute at issue.” | 11 |
| 2 | State v. Rader | green | “resolve all conflicts of evidence in favor of the state and give the state the benefit of all reasonable inferences.” | 4 |
| 3 | In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Blaylock | green | “to begin or set going : make a beginning of” | 3 |
| 4 | Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of Gresham | green | “if the legislature uses different terms in related statutes, it likely intended them to have different meanings.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Eastep | green | “any version of webster's third-regardless of its copy- right date-provides a relevant source of ordinary meaning for statutes enacted any time after 1961, if not earlier.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Branch | neutral | “evidence that a person has lied in response to police questioning in the course of an investigation is not enough to convict the per- son of initiating a false report.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.