Topic: the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine bars the admission… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #14758

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Monteleone.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Monteleone Anchor
nmctapp · 2005
green “the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine bars the admission of legally obtained evidence derived from past police illegalities.” 6
2 State v. Monteleone
nmctapp · 2005
green “if there is sufficient attenuation between the illegality and the consent to search, the evidence is admissible.” 5
3 State v. Ingram
nmctapp · 1998
green “evidence which is obtained as a result of an unconstitutional search or seizure may be suppressed under the exclusionary rule.” 4
4 State v. Portillo
nmctapp · 2011
green “it is established law that evidence discovered as a result of the exploitation of an illegal search or seizure must be suppressed unless it has been purged of its primary taint.” 3
5 State v. Rogers
nmctapp · 1983
green “with respect to marijuana plants protruding through holes in his greenhouse roof to the extent of their visibility from the air” 3
6 State v. Vandenberg
nmctapp · 2002
green “reasonable suspicion based on information obtained from another officer requires that the officer providing information must himself have possessed reasonable suspicion” 3
7 State v. Davis
nm · 2013
green “the helicopter was looking for marijuana plants and they believe they've located some at your residence.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check