Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from City of Sunland Park v. MacIas.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | City of Sunland Park v. MacIas Anchor | green | “res judicata bars not only claims that were raised in the prior proceeding, but also claims that could have been raised.” | 6 |
| 2 | Rosette, Inc. v. United States of Department of the Interior | green | “res judicata applies if three elements are met: (1) a final judgment on the merits in an earlier action, (2) identity of parties or privies in the two suits, and (3) identity of the cause of action in both suits.” | 5 |
| 3 | Moffat v. Branch | green | “the purpose of our application of res judicata is to protect individuals from multiple lawsuits, to promote judicial economy, and to minimize the possibility of inconsistent judgments.” | 4 |
| 4 | Chavez v. City of Albuquerque | green | “(1) how the facts relate in time, space, origin, or motivation; (2) whether, taken together, the facts form a convenient trial unit; and (3) whether treatment of the facts as a single unit conforms to the parties' expectations, or business understanding or usage.” | 3 |
| 5 | Bennett v. Kisluk | green | “to impose upon the client the preclusive effect of rule 1-013(a).” | 3 |
| 6 | Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & Lawless P.A. | green | “significantly, in its complaint computer one did not . . . seek to recover its fees paid to the firm” | 3 |
| 7 | Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & Lawless P.A. | green | “the compulsory counterclaim rule does not apply to an attorney's charging lien,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.