Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State ex rel. D.R..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State ex rel. D.R. Anchor | green | “while delinquency proceedings may in many ways implicate criminal proceedings, sometimes even mimicking them, they are nonetheless civil in nature.” | 14 |
| 2 | State in Interest of AG | green | “no less strenuous than the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” | 6 |
| 3 | State ex rel. J.W. | green | “no less strenuous then the standard of proof required in a criminal proceeding against an adult.” | 4 |
| 4 | State v. Thomas | neutral | “must exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.