Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Ouch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Ouch Anchor | green | “inferences reasonably drawn from the evidence of record which would support a verdict of guilty are to be given effect, and the evidence must be read in the light most favorable to the commonwealth's case.” | 5 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Mattison | green | “specific intent to kill can be established through circumstantial evidence, such as the use of a deadly weapon on a vital part of the victim's body.” | 4 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Calloway | green | “misled the police investigation and to obfuscate his participation in the crime.” | 3 |
| 4 | Commonwealth v. Weigle | green | “under philadelphia county local criminal rule (h), common pleas motions court judges' orders discharging an accused or denying a re-arrest petition constitute final orders subject to appellate review.” | 3 |
| 5 | Commonwealth v. Santos | green | “it is well-established that to convict a defendant of first-degree murder, the commonwealth must show that the defendant killed another person with the specific intent to kill that person and malice aforethought.” | 3 |
| 6 | Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maisenhelder v. Rundle | green | “the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the commonwealth so that inferences that would support a guilty verdict are given effect.” | 3 |
| 7 | Commonwealth v. Ouch | green | “constitutionally infirm unless the inferred fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend.” | 3 |
| 8 | Commonwealth v. Scarborough | green | “as a general rule . . . appellate courts only have jurisdiction over appeals taken from a final order.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.