Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Microsoft Corp. v. Baker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corp. v. Baker Anchor | green | “preserves the proper balance between trial and appellate courts, minimizes the harassment and delay that would result from repeated interlocutory appeals, and promotes the efficient administration of justice.” | 9 |
| 2 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. City of Reno | green | “as a threshold matter, ... a contract between the parties can supersede the default obliga tion to arbitrate under the finra rules.” | 3 |
| 3 | Calumet River Fleeting, Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO | green | “must declare specif ically and separately the respective rights of the parties, not simply state in a memorandum opinion, minute order, or a form prescribed for judgment in a civil case that a motion has been granted or denied.” | 3 |
| 4 | Wisconsin Central Limited v. Tienergy, LLC | green | “rule 58's 'separate doc ument' requirement is important because it keeps jurisdic tional lines clear.” | 3 |
| 5 | Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co Inc | green | “as a threshold matter, ... a contract between the parties can supersede the default obliga tion to arbitrate under the finra rules.” | 3 |
| 6 | Rajesh Gupta v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, L | green | “a written provision in ... a contract ... to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such con tract ... shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable.” | 3 |
| 7 | In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc. | green | “any person who commits, or who willfully aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures the com mission of” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.