Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ex Parte Perkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ex Parte Perkins Anchor | green | “significant or substantial deficits in adaptive behavior.” | 6 |
| 2 | Ex Parte Perkins | green | “before the defendant reached age 18.” | 5 |
| 3 | Jenkins v. State | green | “the amount of evidence incriminating jenkins . . . was overwhelming.” | 4 |
| 4 | Jenkins v. State | green | “the evidence establishing jenkins's guilt was overwhelming.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re: John Ruthell Henry | green | “merely provides new procedures for ensuring that states do not execute members of an already protected group” | 4 |
| 6 | Reeves v. State | green | “this court has repeatedly held that a circuit court is not required to accept, consider, or apply the 'flynn effect' in determining intellectual disability.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.