7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Booth v. Churner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booth v. Churner Anchor | green | “n inmate must exhaust irrespective of the forms of relief sought and offered through administrative avenues.” | 69 |
| 2 | Marsh v. Soares | green | “it is well established that ignorance of the law, even for an incarcerated pro se petitioner, generally does not excuse prompt filing.” | 26 |
| 3 | National Labor Relations Board v. Fes, (A Division of Thermo Power) | green | “testimony . . . amounts to an unsupported, conclusory assertion, which we have held is inadequate to satisfy the movant's burden of proof on summary judgment.” | 22 |
| 4 | Marsh v. Soares | green | “t is well established that 'ignorance of the law, even for an incarcerated pro se petitioner, generally does not excuse prompt filing.” | 12 |
| 5 | Sherrer v. Stephens | green | “s long as a physician exercises professional judgment his behavior will not violate a prisoner's constitutional rights.” | 9 |
| 6 | Gunderson v. Abbott | green | “a state court filing submitted after the . . . deadline does not toll the limitations period.” | 7 |
| 7 | Holland v. Florida | green | “garden variety claim of excusable neglect, such as a simple miscalculation that leads a lawyer to miss a filing deadline, does not warrant equitable tolling.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.