Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dawdy v. Union Pacific RR Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dawdy v. Union Pacific RR Co. Anchor | green | “no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.” | 11 |
| 2 | Dawdy v. Union Pacific RR Co. | green | “an abuse of discretion will be found where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.” | 10 |
| 3 | Botello v. Illinois Central Railroad | green | “it is reasonable to conclude that the plaintiff engaged in forum shopping to suit his individual interests, a strategy contrary to the purposes behind the venue rules.” | 3 |
| 4 | Botello v. Illinois Central Railroad | green | “look at the totality of the circumstances in an effort to determine whether the defendant has proven the factors strongly favor transfer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.