Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Pressley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Pressley Anchor | green | “a confirmatory identification occurs when a witness identifies someone he or she knows from before but cannot identify by name.” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Farrow | green | “entitled to very considerable weight.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Michael Lamb (071262) | green | “must uphold the factual findings underlying the trial court's decision so long as those findings are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Michael Lamb (071262) | green | “appellate courts reviewing a grant or denial of a motion to suppress must uphold the factual findings underlying the trial court's decision so long as those findings are supported by sufficient credible evidence in the record.” | 4 |
| 5 | State v. Rodriquez | green | “the ultimate burden remains on the defendant to prove a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.