Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Elmobdy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Elmobdy Anchor | green | “as factfinder, to pass on the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given to their testimony.” | 10 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Stem | green | “is limited to determining whether the suppression court's factual findings are supported by the record and whether the legal conclusions drawn from those facts are correct.” | 7 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Cephus | green | “where the record supports the findings of the suppression court, we are bound by those facts and may reverse only if the legal conclusions drawn therefrom are in error.” | 4 |
| 4 | Com. v. Jefferson, T. | green | “articulate something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch” | 3 |
| 5 | Com. v. Jefferson, T. | green | “the facts available to the police at the moment of intrusion,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.