Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gruenbaum v. Werner Enterprises, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gruenbaum v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. Anchor | green | “then the burden shifts to the non-movant to show that to produce the information would be unduly burdensome.” | 11 |
| 2 | Superior Production Partnership v. Gordon Auto Body Parts Co. | green | “in sum, 'although a plaintiff should not be denied access to information necessary to establish her claim, neither may a plaintiff be permitted to 'go fishing' and a trial court retains discretion to determine that a discovery request is too broad and oppressive.” | 8 |
| 3 | Anwar v. Dow Chemical Co. | green | “a plaintiff should have access to information necessary to establish her claim, but a plaintiff may not be permitted to 'go fishing'; the trial court retains discretion.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.