Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Montgomery v. Louisiana.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montgomery v. Louisiana Anchor | green | “miller announced a substantive rule that is retroactive in cases on collateral review.” | 19 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Whitehawk | green | “a new rule of constitutional law is applied retroactively to cases on collateral review only if the united states supreme court or the pennsylvania supreme court specifically holds it to be retroactively applicable to those cases.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.