Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Dudli, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2006).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Dudli, Unpublished Decision (2-13-2006) Anchor | neutral | “appellate review of a decision on a motion to suppress evidence presents mixed questions of law and fact.” | 17 |
| 2 | State v. Stephenson, Unpublished Decision (9-27-2004) | green | “specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.” | 5 |
| 3 | State v. Carlson | green | “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.