Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Lopez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Lopez Anchor | green | “the market value of the property at the time and place of the crime, or if such cannot be satisfactorily ascertained, the cost of replacement of the property within a reasonable time after the crime” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Lawson | green | “the record 'does not contain sufficient evidence to establish the amount of restitution to be imposed” | 8 |
| 3 | People v. Walker | green | “conclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Sheehy | green | “that the jury had a reasonable basis for inferring, rather than speculating, that the value of the property exceeded the statutory threshold” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. Quigley | green | “which requires no proof of value” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.