Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 27 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Duffen v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duffen v. State Anchor | green | “a self-represented litigant acquires no greater rights than any other litigant ( see duffen v. state , 245 ad2d 653 , 665 n.y.s.2d 978 ; brooks v. inn at saratoga assn. , 188 ad2d 921 , 591 n.y.s.2d 625 )” | 20 |
| 2 | Park v. DeJonge | green | “the kings county court help center is prohibited by law from giving legal advice and can not complete forms on your behalf” | 4 |
| 3 | Albala v. City of New York | green | “while the temptation is always great to provide a form of relief to one who has suffered, it is well established that the law cannot provide a remedy for every injury incurred” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.