Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. W. T. Grant Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. W. T. Grant Co. Anchor | green | “the necessary determination is that there exists some cognizable danger of recurrent violation, something more than the mere possibility which serves to keep the case alive.” | 19 |
| 2 | Lumumba Incumaa v. Bryan Stirling | green | “prolonged solitary confinement exacts a heavy psychological toll that often continues to plague an inmate's mind even after he is resocialized.” | 4 |
| 3 | McClary v. Kelly | green | “that prolonged isolation from social and environmental stimulation increases the risk of developing mental illness does not strike this court as rocket science.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.