Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co. Anchor | green | “the heavy burden of making a convincing showing that it is invalid because it is unjust and unreasonable in its consequences.” | 10 |
| 2 | Permian Basin Area Rate Cases | green | “the heavy burden of making a convincing showing that it is invalid because it is unjust and unreasonable in its consequences.” | 10 |
| 3 | Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. | green | “regulation does not insure that the business shall produce net revenues.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.