Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ramey v. Reinertson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramey v. Reinertson Anchor | green | “defers to the poms provisions unless it determines they are 'arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.” | 12 |
| 2 | Cathy McNamar v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “a set of policies issued by the ssa to be used in processing claims.” | 4 |
| 3 | Lull v. Colvin | green | “addresses twenty specific mental functions relevant to the vocational determinations required at steps four and five.” | 4 |
| 4 | Lull v. Colvin | green | “the psychiatric review technique ("prt” | 3 |
| 5 | Myers v. Astrue | green | “clear the alj improperly relied on a statement made by dr. kennedy outside of the record in finding that plaintiff lacked credibility.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.