Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Orion Pictures Corporation, Debtor, Orion Pictures Corporation v. Showtime Networks, Inc., Formerly Known as Showtime/the Movie Channel, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Orion Pictures Corporation, Debtor, Orion Pictures Corporation v. Showtime Networks, Inc., Formerly Known as Showtime/the Movie Channel, Inc. Anchor | green | “whether the claim or proceeding is core or non-core, whether it is legal or equitable, and considerations of efficiency, prevention of forum shopping, and uniformity in the administration of bankruptcy law.” | 11 |
| 2 | In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation | green | “strongly disfavor discretionary interlocutory appeals.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation | green | “the district judge has 'unfettered discretion to deny certification of an order for interlocutory appeal even when a party has demonstrated that the criteria of 28 u.s.c. 1292 (b) are met.” | 3 |
| 4 | Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas | green | “meaning of a contract generally is considered to be a question of law for the court, a question of contract interpretation typically is not a 'controlling question of law' that serves as a basis for an interlocutory appeal.” | 3 |
| 5 | Walker, Truesdell, Roth & Associates ex rel. Extended Stay Litigation Trust v. Blackstone Group, L.P. (In re Extended Stay, Inc.) | green | “permissive withdrawal to take 'the case to a district court for trial by jury, on asserted seventh amendment grounds, will become a question ripe for determination if and when the case becomes trial-ready.” | 3 |
| 6 | Credit One Financial v. Anderson (In re Anderson) | green | “(1) there is conflicting authority on the issue, or (2) the issue is particularly difficult and of first impression for the second circuit.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.