Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Denman Tire Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Denman Tire Corp. Anchor | green | “it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would be unable to recover under any set of facts.” | 13 |
| 2 | State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Denman Tire Corp. | green | “appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would be unable to recover under any set of facts.” | 9 |
| 3 | TAG/ICIB Services, Inc. v. Pan American Grain Co. | green | “accept as true the well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint, draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the plaintiffs favor, and determine whether the complaint, so read, sets forth facts sufficient to justify recovery on any cognizable theory.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.