Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boston Beer Co. v. Slesar Bros. Brewing Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boston Beer Co. v. Slesar Bros. Brewing Co. Anchor | green | “proof of secondary meaning entails vigorous evidentiary requirements.” | 9 |
| 2 | The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. v. The Bridgewater Candle Company, LLC | green | “the design and appearance of a product together with the elements making up the overall image that serves to identify the product presented to the consumer.” | 6 |
| 3 | I.P. Lund Trading ApS v. Kohler Co. | green | “the primary purpose of trade dress protection is to protect that which identifies a product's source.” | 4 |
| 4 | The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. v. The Bridgewater Candle Company, LLC | green | “the burden to clearly identify the trade dress at issue is on the plaintiff.” | 4 |
| 5 | I.P. Lund Trading ApS v. Kohler Co. | green | “courts recognize trade dress claims based both on product packaging and on 'product design/configuration.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.