Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 853 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias Anchor | green | “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” | 442 |
| 2 | Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias | green | “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” | 235 |
| 3 | Djenaba Camara v. John Ashcroft, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States | green | “because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum - even though the facts that must be proved are the same - an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under 8 u.s.c. 1231(b)(3).” | 105 |
| 4 | Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General | green | “it can be reversed only if the evidence presented ... was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution existed.” | 26 |
| 5 | Liri Norek Marku v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “that the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion, but compels it.” | 21 |
| 6 | Li Fang Lin v. Mukasey | green | “affording appropriate deference to the board's interpretation of the immigration and nationality act and any attendant regulations.” | 14 |
| 7 | Ceraj v. Mukasey | green | “because the bia adopted the ij's decision with additional commentary, we review the decision of the ij, as supplemented by the bia, as the final administrative order.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.