Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rakowski v. Lucente.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rakowski v. Lucente Anchor | green | “where both parties were aware of an additional claim at the time of signing the release, courts have given effect to the general re- lease language of the agreement to release that claim as well.” | 5 |
| 2 | Gladinus v. Laughlin | green | “the understanding of all con- cerned parties that the release affected her claim for property damage only and not her action for personal injuries.” | 5 |
| 3 | Darrell Cannon v. Jon Burge | green | “all claims he has, or may have in the future, arising either directly or indi- rectly out of the incident which was the basis of this litiga- tion.” | 5 |
| 4 | Darrell Cannon v. Jon Burge | green | “attempted to carve out his claims for wrongful conviction and malicious prosecution as separate and distinct incidents not covered by the settle- ment.” | 5 |
| 5 | M.T. Bonk Company and Mark T. Bonk v. Milton Bradley Company and Hasbro, Inc. | green | “we have made it clear that rule 54(d) creates a pre- sumption that the prevailing party will recover costs, and that the ultimate decision to award costs is within the district court's discretion.” | 3 |
| 6 | M.T. Bonk Company and Mark T. Bonk v. Milton Bradley Company and Hasbro, Inc. | green | “we will re- verse the district court's determination on the reasonableness and necessity of the expenses only for an abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.