Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Robert Maher, AKA \Bob M.\".
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Robert Maher, AKA \Bob M.\" Anchor | green | “assure itself simply that the conduct to which the defendant admits is in fact an offense under the statutory provision under which he is pleading guilty.” | 14 |
| 2 | United States v. Turenne A. Renaud | green | “such minor errors as a modest understatement of the maximum penalty, where the penalty actually imposed did not exceed the maximum as erroneously represented by the court.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Scott Torrellas | green | “a defendant raises on appeal a claim of rule 11 error that he did not raise in the district court, that claim is reviewable only for plain error.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. Turenne A. Renaud | green | “generally require sentencing courts to adhere strictly to the specific provisions of rule 11.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.