Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corp. v. Deal, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corp. v. Deal, LLC Anchor | green | “the defendant's contacts with the forum state represent a purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in that state” | 6 |
| 2 | Carreras v. PMG COLLINS, LLC | green | “random, fortuitous, or attenuated forum contacts.” | 4 |
| 3 | C.W. Downer & Company v. Bioriginal Food & Science Corp | green | “voluntariness and foreseeability.” | 4 |
| 4 | PREP Tours Inc. v. American Youth Soccer Org. | green | “are such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.” | 4 |
| 5 | PREP Tours Inc. v. American Youth Soccer Org. | green | “only a demonstrable nexus between the complaint's claims and the activities in the forum that properly may be attributed to the defendant, such that the litigation itself is founded directly on those activities.” | 4 |
| 6 | MetalForming, Inc. v. Schechtl Maschinenbau Gmbh | green | “advertising in the forum state, establishing channels for providing regular advice to customers in the forum state, or marketing the product through a distributor who has agreed to serve as the sales agent in the forum state.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.