Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care Center Anchor | green | “we have recognized the authority of a court to take judicial notice of government websites.” | 10 |
| 2 | Ruder M. Calderon-Ramirez v. James W. McCament | green | “mandamus relief will be granted if the plaintiff can demonstrate that the three enumerated conditions are present: (1) a clear right to the relief sought; (2) that the defendant has a duty to do the act in question; and (3) no other adequate remedy is available.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States v. Raymond Henderson | green | “to compel an officer or employee of the united states or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.