Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 26 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James Latiolais v. Eagle, Incorporated Anchor | green | “congress broadened federal officer removal to actions, not just causally connected, but alternatively connected or associated, with acts under color of federal office.” | 7 |
| 2 | Janya Sawyer v. Foster Wheeler LLC | green | “courts have unhesitatingly treated the 'acting under' requirement as satisfied where a contractor seeks to remove a case involving injuries arising from equipment that it manufactured for the government.” | 6 |
| 3 | Thomas Venezia v. Bonds Robinson, Jr. | green | “complex issues, but the propriety of removal does not depend on the answers.” | 4 |
| 4 | Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co. | green | “commercially available products did not con- tain the agent orange herbicides in a concentration as high as that found in agent orange.” | 3 |
| 5 | Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co. | green | “courts have unhesitatingly treated the 'acting under' requirement as satisfied where a contractor seeks to remove a case involving injuries arising from equipment that it manufactured for the government.” | 3 |
| 6 | Mayor and City Council of Balt v. BP P.L.C. | green | “a standardized consumer product,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.